If Canada is 'Oil Rich' Why are We So in Debt?

Tue, 2013-03-05 12:39Kevin Grandia
Kevin Grandia's picture

If Canada is 'Oil Rich' Why are We So in Debt?

Canada has the third largest proven oil reserves in the world, but the province of Alberta is planning to cut education and health care spending this year, and Canada's national debt stands at a whopping $600 billion (CAD). 

How can that be? With so many people calling our massive tar sands reserves the “Saudi Arabia of the North,” how can we be so cash-strapped? How can the Alberta government be planning to cut funding to schools, education and health care if the province is so oil rich? 

The best answer can be found in Norway, which this year alone will enjoy a $44 billion budget surplus. The country has the 22nd largest proven oil reserves in the world and about 40-percent less oil is produced by that country, compared to Canada. 

On top of massive government budget surpluses, Norway also has no foreign debt, and $634 billion set aside as a public savings fund. This fund, called the Government Sovereign Wealth fund - set up to collect oil and gas revenues - is projected to be worth $1 trillion by 2020 and currently holds more than 1-percent of all the world's equity. 

To put it simply, Norway is rolling in the dough and their number one sector is oil and gas exploration, production and export.

There are many differences between Norway and Canada that can explain why Norway is so rich and Canada so relatively poor, but there is one huge difference that stands out amongst the rest: oil royalties. Royalties are the amount a government charges oil companies for being allowed to extract and sell the country's oil.

Norway charges oil companies about 70-percent of their profits for the right to extract and sell Norway's oil. So for every dollar a company like ExxonMobil or British Petroleum makes in profit in Norway, about 70-cents of that dollar goes to the government and back to the people of Norway. 

A director of the Norwegian Ministry of Oil & Energy, Matte Agerup, summed up Norway's philosophy on their oil reserves best when she explained that, “the state [Norway] operated on the basis that the oil company was the helper in harnessing the country's natural resources, but that the oil ultimately belongs to the nation.”

The Canadian government does not charge a royalty on the profits of oil companies operating in the Alberta tar sands, only the Alberta provincial government does. In 2009, the Alberta government collected more in gambling and casino revenue than it did in royalties from oil companies.

In recent years, the Alberta government has been collecting roughly a five to ten-percent royalty from oil companies operating in the tar sands (the calculations, as you can imagine, are complicated, but this appears a safe estimate). Author and tar sands expert, Andrew Nikiforuk, writing in the Tyee, provides a much more in-depth look at the numbers if you're interested. 

Suffice it to say, Canadians are not getting the returns they deserve for the risks they are inheriting. Companies like ExxonMobil, who last year made an estimated $104 million a day from global operations, get to extract oil from Canada's tar sands and sell it off to foreign interests, while Canadians get little more than the resulting climate change pollution and massive toxic lakes of sludge that seep into our freshwater reserves. 

Great deal if you're ExxonMobil. Bum deal for Canadians. But the answer seems pretty simple - charge the oil companies way more for the right to extract and sell our country's oil. Politicians, of course, will tell you it's much more complicated than that. 

But trust me, it isn't. Norway did it and the oil companies are still there. And, in fact, they are investing more than ever.

Image Credit: Pembina Institute via flickr.

Comments

Alberta's problems stem from self delusion.

Conservatives actually believe that Alberta's wealth comes from hard work.  It doesn't, we pump money out of the ground.  But they will tell you all kinds of conservative values are the real reason we make money.  (Last I checked, they aren't going to pump that money out of the ground somewhere else.)

Conservatives value flat tax, and low tax. Essentially pillaging any gains made from oil revenues.  Harper is currently doing the same thing federally, blowing money out the door faster than a drunken sailor. We'll be needed the Liberals back just to clean up the fiscal mess. (I say that with distain because they don't care for the environment.)

Lastly, oil and gas is boom bust.  It doesn't take an economist to tell you that if you don't know how much money you will make next year, you can't budget.  The looney ride here is that Conservatives and Wild Rose extremists consider it acceptable to provide random levels of service.  They are litterally gambling with peoples lives and jobs.  (They talk about medical workers like some sort of faceless mass of stupid workers.)

 

IMO.. we should pay tax to cover all operating expenses of government and tame the wild ride we have here.  We should save oil revenues, and or use them strictly for capital expenditures.  Alternatively Alberta could just give away the money.  On a good year, we get a big rebate, on a bad year, we don't.  (That would be the libertarian zero government solution.)

[x]
Joe Miskokomon

The Chippewas of the Thames First Nation have launched a legal challenge against the National Energy Board’s (NEB) decision to approve Enbridge’s Line 9 oil pipeline project in southern Ontario and southern Quebec. The NEB – Canada’s independent energy regulator – approved the project to ship 300,000 barrels a day of oil and oilsands bitumen last month with soft conditions.

This 40-year old pipe is subject to corrosion and...

read more